Sir
Ken Robinson stated that "We are educating
people out of their creative capacities." and to a certain point, I
agree. Although I feel that in some cases children are sometimes encouraged to
pursue their creativity, it seems that it takes a back seat compared the more
academic subjects like science, maths etc. It
seems as though, at this day in age people are urged to take subjects that will
lead to an eventual well paying job or career at the end of it.
Sir Ken
Robinson said "You were probably steered away from things at school
when you were a kid - things you liked - on the grounds that you would never
get a job doing that: 'Don't do music, you're not going to be a musician. Don't
do art, you won't be an artist' benign advice - now profoundly mistaken".
Unfortunately, this seems to be the case. We are told throughout our entire
childhood that we need to do well in school to get good jobs in order to
provide a good life for ourselves and our families. Putting that much pressure
or stress onto children could seriously affect their desire to be creative
since they might choose to ignore their passion for the arts in order to pursue
a career that might end up in them pushing numbers in an office. A child may
have a raw talent in art, music or drama but since they are being told that
it's not as important as some of the "real" subjects they might give
up on it and potentially lose out on a career in that field.
Whilst
I agree that the more academic subjects are very important and useful, it does
not draw from the fact that creativity
and innovation is a vital part of child development and without it there would
be no movies, songs or any other type of artistic concepts. We would simply be
a race of drones, following orders, living day by day never progressing forward
in terms of technology or anything for that matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment